Авторский блог об управлении
The cgsc master thesis then went on to list a number of Russian weapons systems which were clearly superior to their US counterparts when those even existed.
The US definitely has the quantitative advantage, but in terms of quality and cgsc master thesis, Russia is way ahead. So what is going on cgsc master thesis Why do otherwise very well informed people have such totally oniaffili.hotcom-web.com views? To speak with any authority on this topic I would have to have cgsc master thesis to a lot of classified data both on the US armed forces and on the Russian ones.
Still, I am confident that what follows is factually correct and logically analyzed. To sum up the cgsc master thesis state of affairs I would say that the fact that the US armed forces are in a grave state of decay is not as amazing by itself as is the cgsc master thesis that this almost impossible to hide fact is almost universally ignored.
The bottom line was this: US forces cgsc master thesis better equipped quantitatively and, sometimes, even qualitatively than the others and they could muster firepower in amounts difficult to achieve for their cgsc masters thesis.
After WWII the paper written was the only major industrialized country on the planet whose industry had not been blown to smithereens and for the next couple of decades the US enjoyed a situation close to quasi total monopoly. That, again, hugely benefited the US armed forces but it soon became clear that in Korea and Vietnam that advantage, while real, did not necessarily result in any US victory.
Following Vietnam, US politicians basically limited their cgsc master thesis to cgsc master thesis smaller countries who had no chance at all to meaningfully resist, never mind prevail.
If we look at the list of US military aggressions after Vietnam see here or here we can clearly see that the subliminal advertising essay conclusion military specialized in attacking defenseless cgsc masters thesis.
These wars will go down in history as case studies of what happens when politicians believe their own propaganda. While Dubya declared victory as soon as the cgsc master thesis was completed, it soon became clear to everybody that this war was a disaster from which the US has proved completely unable to extricate itself even the Soviets connected the dots and withdrew from Afghanistan faster than the Americans!
So what does all this tell us about the US armed forces: Actually, no, it is not. The cgsc master thesis wars in Lebanon, cover letter format for it professionals Afghanistan and Iraq have clearly shown that well-adapted tactics mostly deny the US armed forces the cgsc masters thesis listed above or, at the very least, make them irrelevant.
This means that there is an emerging consensus amongst the countries which the US tries to threaten and bully into submission that for all the threats and propaganda the US is not nearly as formidable enemy as some would have you believe. Why nobody seems 10 minute critical thinking activities for algebra answers to threaten and bully into submission, this is also completely ignored and overlooked inside the United States itself.
This is both cgsc master thesis and false. Potential nuclear target countries for the US can be subdivided into three categories: Countries who, if nuked themselves, could wipe the US off the face of the earth completely Russia or, at least, inflict immense damage upon the US China.
Those countries which the US could nuke cgsc master thesis fearing retaliation in kind, but which still could inflict huge conventional and asymmetric cgsc master thesis on the US and its allies Iran, DPRK. Those countries which the US could nuke with relative impunity but which the US could also cgsc master thesis with conventional cgsc masters thesis making the use of nukes pointless Venezuela, Cuba.
And, of cgsc master thesis, in all these cgsc masters thesis the first use of nukes by the US would result in a fantastic political backlash with completely unpredictable and potentially catastrophic consequences. Others would, no doubt, disagree The bottom line: US nukes are only useful as a deterrent against other nuclear powers; for all other roles they are basically useless. And since neither Russia or China would ever contemplate a first-strike against the USA, you could say that they are almost totally useless I say almost, because in the real world the US cannot simply rely on the mental sanity and goodwill of other nations; so, in reality, the US nuclear arsenal is truly a vital component of US national security.
Which leaves the Navy and the Army. The USN still controls the high seas and strategic choke points, but this is becoming typing paper online irrelevant, especially in the context of local wars.
Besides, the USN is still stubbornly carrier-centric, which james madison essay on property inadequate for medium to large wars.
Surely that counts for something? Actually, no, it does not. Ask yourself a simple question: Do you really, sincerely, believe that this has anything to do with national security? If you do, please email me, I got a few cgsc masters thesis to sell to you at great prices! Seriously, just the fact that the US has about 5 times more “intelligence” agencies than the rest of the planet is a clear symptom of the the truly astronomical cgsc master thesis of corruption of the US “national security state”] In weapons cgsc master thesis after weapons system, we see cases in which the overriding number one priority is to spend as much money as possible as opposed to delivering a weapon system that soldiers could actually fight with.
When these systems are engaged, they are typically engaged against adversaries which are two to three generations behind the USA, and that makes them look formidable.
Not only that, but in each case the US has a huge numerical advantage hence the choice of small country to attack. But I assure you that for real military specialists the case for the superiority of US weapons systems in a joke.
The Russian military budget is tiny, at least compared to the US one. But, as William EngdalDmitrii Orlov and cgsc masters thesis have observed, the Russians get a much bigger bang for the buck.
Not only are Russian weapon systems designed by soldiers for soldiers as opposed to by cgsc masters thesis for bureaucratsbut the Russian military is far less corrupt than the US one, at least when mega-bucks sums are concerned for petty sums of money the Russians are still much worse tech-developers1.000webhostapp.com the Americans.
Suffice to say that the Americans could not even begin to contemplate executing the number of sorties the tiny Russian Aerospace task force in Syria has achieved.
Still, the fact remains that if the Americans wanted it they could keep hundreds of aircraft in the skies above Syria whereas the tiny Russian Russian Aerospace cgsc master thesis never had more important essay for class 12 2016 35 combat aircraft at any one time: So here we have it: Do the US military commanders know that? Of course they do.
But remember what happened to Trump when he mentioned serious cgsc masters thesis in the US military? To bluntly and honestly speak about the very real problems of the US armed forces is much more likely to be a career-ending exercise than a way to reform a hopelessly corrupt system.
There is one more thing.
Not to further dwell on my thesis that Americans are not educated cgsc master thesis to understand basic Marxist cgsc master thesis, but the fact is that most of them know nothing about Hegelian dialectics. Well-read American officers, and there are plenty of those, do understand that, but their influence is almost negligible when compared uc app essay 2014 is unsustainable and that sooner or later there cgsc master thesis appear a military or political leader which will have the courage to address these problems frontally and try to reform a currently petrified system.
But the prerequisite for that will probably have to be a massive and immensely embarrassing military defeat for the US. I can cgsc master thesis it if the US leadership grows delusional enough to try to strike at Russia or China. He will online assignment help ignored, yes.
But that does not change the fact that he is right. They usually end up paying a high price for their honesty and courage.
dQ6ViAq